Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a global score of 89.7, which is much better than the Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 global score. Galaxy S10 Lite's body is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner, but also much heavier than Moto X (2014). The Moto X (2014) has a brighter screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a much smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better amount of pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit better processor than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and more cpu cores. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto X (2014), because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy S10 Lite takes way better photos and videos than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger aperture for better photos in low light environments, a much more mega pixels camera, better video frame rates and a much larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality photographs.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a superior battery lifetime than Moto X (2014), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2300mAh.
The Galaxy S10 Lite is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.