Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Gold | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is much better than the Moto X (2014)'s score of 73.4. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 has 13 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0. Galaxy S20's body is extremely newer and thinner than the Moto X (2014)'s, although it is also somewhat heavier.
The Moto X (2014) features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S20, although it has a lot lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, a way lower count of pixels per inch in the display and a little smaller screen. Galaxy S20 counts with a much bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features a bit better processing power than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and a larger number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S20 features a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 74% more battery capacity.
The Galaxy S20 shoots better photos and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is way more expensive than Moto X (2014), but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.