Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Gold | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is way better than the Moto X (2014), with a 90.8 score against 73.4. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 FE has newer 11 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, counting with lots of additional features and performance optimizations. The Galaxy S20 FE is a newer and somewhat thinner phone than Moto X (2014), although it's also a lot heavier.
Galaxy S20 FE features just a bit better processing power than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and 4 GB more RAM. The Moto X (2014) has a sharper display than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater amount of pixels in each inch in the display.
Galaxy S20 FE has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 FE features a much better battery lifetime than Moto X (2014), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE takes better photographs and videos than Moto X (2014), because although it has a worse video definition and a back facing camera with lesser mega-pixels, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto X (2014), but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.