Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Gold | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Moto X (2014), having a 98 score against 73.4. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is way newer and somewhat thinner than the Moto X (2014)'s, but it is a lot heavier. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, so it counts with a lot of extra features.
The Moto X (2014) counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a way smaller screen, a way worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a little bit lower amount of pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and a greater number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a greater camera than Moto X (2014), because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations, a way larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot better 108 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 117% more battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto X (2014), but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.