Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Gold | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is much better than Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 score. Even though Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is notably heavier than Moto X (2014), it's somewhat thinner and also notably newer. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, giving you some extra features.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a little higher pixel quantity per screen inch and a much bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's CPU is just as good as the CPU in Motorola Moto X (2014), because although the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger camera aperture to take better low-light images and videos, a way better video quality and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better battery lifetime than Moto X (2014), because it has a 117% greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more than the Moto X (2014), but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.