Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-09-04 | -- |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Gold | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S24 FE has a general score of 76, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto X (2014)'s global score of 73.4. Galaxy S24 FE is a notably heavier but thinner cellphone than the Motorola Moto X (2014). Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S24 FE has a more recent 14 version and Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, providing the user lots of additional features.
The Galaxy S24 FE has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE features a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has 96 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) has a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores and an extra graphics processing unit. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE features a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 2300mAh.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) shoots slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a tinier aperture and a back camera with much less MP.
Although Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto X (2014). If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto X (2014), letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.