Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android |
| 2014-09-04 | -- |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 5.08 ounces | -- |
| Gold | -- |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra has a global score of 80.2, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto X (2014)'s score of 73.4. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra counts with Android OS, and Motorola Moto X (2014) works with Android 5.0 OS. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra design is notably thinner and lighter than Motorola Moto X (2014).
The Moto X (2014) features a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Motorola Moto X (2014) has a more vivid display than Galaxy S24 Ultra, although it has a way smaller display, a little bit lower pixels number in each screen inch and a way lower 1920 x 1080 resolution.
The Galaxy S24 Ultra captures clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a way better resolution camera in the back. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra features a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S24 Ultra features a much better battery life than Moto X (2014), because it has a 117% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.