Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-09-04 | -- |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 5.08 ounces | -- |
| Gold | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is much better than the Motorola Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 general score. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 has a more recent 14 version and Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, so it offers a couple nice extra features and performance improvements. The Galaxy S25 is a noticeably lighter and extremely thinner phone than the Motorola Moto X (2014).
The Motorola Moto X (2014) has a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has lesser cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. Galaxy S25 counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has a little lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Galaxy S25 counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has more internal storage. Galaxy S25 has a much better camera than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a way better video definition, a way larger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a larger diafragm aperture for better low light images and videos.
Galaxy S25 has a way better battery life than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto X (2014). If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Moto X (2014), and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.