Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-09-04 | -- |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 5.08 ounces | -- |
| Gold | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than the Motorola Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 global score. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version while Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, so it provides you lots of additional features. Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is lighter and extremely thinner than Motorola Moto X (2014).
The Moto X (2014) has a much better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a more vivid screen than Moto X (2014), because it has a way better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a bit higher pixel density and a really bigger display.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better camera than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a way higher resolution back camera, a way larger aperture to capture better low-light captures, a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better battery performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.