Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2021-03-12 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Gold | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has a score of 78.1, which is a little bit better than the Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 general score. These devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has 11 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, offering a couple nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 construction is noticeably newer and a bit thinner than the Moto X (2014)'s, although it is also somewhat heavier.
The Moto X (2014) features just a little better performance than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has 4 less CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Moto X (2014) counts with a lot better display than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1920 x 1080.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 features a superior memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 32 GB more internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 counts with longer battery duration than Moto X (2014), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2300mAh.
Moto X (2014) takes a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a back facing camera with less mega pixels resolution and a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a way higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.