Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Gold | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 424 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than Moto X (2014), with an 80.1 score against 73.4. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro construction is a lot newer, but a lot thicker and incredibly heavier than Moto X (2014).
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little better hardware performance than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores. The Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with just a bit better display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a lot worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
The Moto X (2014) shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos and a smaller sensor, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a better resolution and a much better (4K) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto X (2014). So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, else you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto X (2014), giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.