Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is better than the Moto X (2014)'s global score of 73.4. The Galaxy XCover Pro body has the same thickness than Moto X (2014), but it's notably heavier. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0.
Moto X (2014) features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and less cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. Moto X (2014) counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1920 x 1080px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
Galaxy XCover Pro captures a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has a way smaller back camera sensor offering a much lower image quality, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a back camera with a much better 25 MP resolution and a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light situations.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 2300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is more expensive than the Motorola Moto X (2014), but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.