Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto X (2014)'s overall score of 73.4. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version and Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a noticeably newer and noticeably thinner cellphone than Motorola Moto X (2014), but it's also incredibly heavier.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) features a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a way smaller screen, a bit less pixels per inch in the display and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit faster processor than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and also faster).
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip captures a bit better photos and videos than Moto X (2014), because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with lesser MP, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations and a larger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip has a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 43% more battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto X (2014). So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto X (2014), resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.