Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than Moto X (2014), having a score of 85.6 against 73.4. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has 11 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, so it provides you some additional features. Galaxy Z Flip 3's body is way newer and thinner than the Moto X (2014)'s, although it is heavier.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little bit better performance than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM. Moto X (2014) features a slightly better display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a much smaller screen, a little lower pixel quantity per display inch and a little worse 1920 x 1080 resolution.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a better 13 mega pixels resolution back camera. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a superior memory for apps and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 96 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a much longer battery life than Moto X (2014), because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto X (2014). So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip 3, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Moto X (2014), resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.