Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto X (2014)'s score of 73.4. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, counting with lots of additional features and increased performance. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is notably heavier than the Motorola Moto X (2014), it's noticeably thinner and way newer.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster) and 6 GB more RAM. Moto X (2014) has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a just a little worse pixels density, a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a really smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has a worse video quality and a back facing camera with less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better captures in low light environments and a bigger sensor shooting higher quality photographs.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more than Motorola Moto X (2014), but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.