Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Gold | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Motorola Moto X (2014), getting a general score of 94.6 against 73.4. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is a lot newer and thinner than Motorola Moto X (2014)'s, although it is also incredibly heavier. These phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has newer 11 version and Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, providing the user some nice extra features.
The Moto X (2014) features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better display pixels density. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto X (2014), because it has 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with 10 GB more RAM memory and 4 more processing cores. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much longer battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures much better pictures and videos than Moto X (2014), because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with less MP resolution, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a larger aperture for better low-light captures and video.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto X (2014). If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Moto X (2014), letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.