Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Gold | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a lot better than the Moto X (2014), with a 90.6 score against 73.4. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is extremely newer and a lot thinner than Moto X (2014)'s, but it is a lot heavier. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has 11 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little better performance than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and more cores. The Moto X (2014) has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a lot worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixels density.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has more internal storage. Moto X (2014) has a greater camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a F2.2 diafragm aperture, the Moto X (2014) also has a more MP back camera.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much better battery duration than Moto X (2014), because it has a 91% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.