Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2017-04-05 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Gold | Black, Blue and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZs is a little bit better than Moto X (2014), having a score of 77.2 against 73.4. Even though the Xperia XZs is heavier than the Moto X (2014), it's thinner and also much newer. Moto X (2014) features a little better performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, the Moto X (2014) also counts with a graphics co-processor.
The Moto X (2014) has a sharper screen than Sony Xperia XZs. They have an equal 1920 x 1080px resolution, the same pixels density and a screen with the same size. The Xperia XZs captures a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xperia XZs also has a much better resolution back camera, a larger camera aperture for better photos in low light environments, a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much better quality photos and higher 960 fps video frame rates.
The Sony Xperia XZs has a very superior memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have equal internal memory, the Sony Xperia XZs also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 256 GB. Xperia XZs has longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 26 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Sony Xperia XZs is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto X (2014). If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Moto X (2014), letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.