Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2021-04-20 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Gold | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The TCL 20 Pro 5G is a little bit better than Moto X (2014), having a 76.1 score against 73.4. Both devices in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but TCL 20 Pro 5G has newer 11 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, so it gives some extra features. TCL 20 Pro 5G's body is notably newer and just a little thinner, but also extremely heavier than Moto X (2014).
The Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a bit more powerful processor than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has 4 lesser CPU cores and less RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a brighter screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a really smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has 224 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB. The TCL 20 Pro 5G features a much better battery performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
TCL 20 Pro 5G takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a larger camera aperture, a way higher resolution camera and a lot larger back camera sensor taking way better quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.