Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is much better than Moto X (2014), with a global score of 81.1 against 73.4. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is extremely newer and thinner than the Moto X (2014)'s, but it's also way heavier. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a newer 10 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, providing you lots of additional features.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and Moto X (2014) count with similar processing units, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 4 more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM. Moto X (2014) has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a camera in the back with much more megapixels, a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low-light situations and a lot larger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs and videos.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 32 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.