Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-04-07 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is just a bit better than Motorola Moto X (2014), getting a overall score of 79 against 73.4. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a newer 11 version while Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, counting with some additional features. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S body is newer and thinner than Motorola Moto X (2014)'s, although it is also notably heavier.
Motorola Moto X (2014) features a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher display density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with much more memory for games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) features a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S shoots greater pictures and videos than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a way bigger back camera sensor, a larger diafragm aperture for better low light images and a camera with a much higher resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a way better battery duration than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 2300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is also a lot cheaper, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.