Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | ZTE |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-12-21 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Gold | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 20 has an overall score of 77.8, which is slightly better than the Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 score. ZTE Axon 20's body is notably newer and noticeably thinner than the Moto X (2014)'s, but it is also notably heavier. These phones have Android operating system, but ZTE Axon 20 has newer 10 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, so it provides the user some extra features.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) features a more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a lot smaller display and a quite lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little greater display pixel density. ZTE Axon 20 features a much bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has more internal storage.
ZTE Axon 20 has a bit superior processor than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. ZTE Axon 20 has a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has an 83% more battery size.
The ZTE Axon 20 shoots greater photos and videos than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video definition, the ZTE Axon 20 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images, higher video frame rate, a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality photographs and a back camera with lot more MP.
Although ZTE Axon 20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto X (2014). If you want to save some money, you can get the Moto X (2014), letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.