Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2015-09-03 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 is much better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), with a general score of 83.3 against 74.1. Although iPhone 11 is just a little heavier than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), it's noticeably thinner and also newer. The Apple iPhone 11 has a more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Apple iPhone 11 also has more RAM and a 64 bits processor.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has just a bit better looking screen than Apple iPhone 11, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher pixel quantity per inch of screen and a much better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) shoots a bit better videos and photos than iPhone 11, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing images and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a way higher 21 megapixels resolution.
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 11, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. The Apple iPhone 11 counts with a bit better battery life than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 4% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.