Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2015-09-03 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max is better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), with an 85.3 score against 74.1. IPhone 11 Pro Max is a notably newer and way thinner cellphone than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), but it is also a lot heavier. The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a little more vivid display than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1242 x 2688px and a little lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a bit larger display.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a greater processing power than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same number of cores, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also has a 64-bits processing unit and more RAM. Moto X Pure Edition (2015) captures clearer pictures and videos than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a much better resolution camera and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB.
IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with greater battery performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 3969mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.