Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 88.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 829.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 is much better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having an 88.7 score against 74.1. IPhone 12's construction is newer, much thinner and just a bit lighter than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The iPhone 12 counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have 6 cpu cores, the iPhone 12 also has a 64-bits processing unit and more RAM memory.
The Apple iPhone 12 counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a bit worse 1170 x 2532 pixels resolution and a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite bigger display. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) takes clearer pictures and videos than iPhone 12, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a way more mega pixels camera.
The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 12, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB.
The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Apple iPhone 12, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2815mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.