Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 14.x |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.18 x 2.53 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 4.76 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 477 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit, 5 nm (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 mini is much better than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting a general score of 88.5 against 74.1. Apple iPhone 12 mini is a newer phone, and it's also notably thinner and lighter than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Apple iPhone 12 mini counts with a brighter screen than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), although it has a bit smaller screen, a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a just a bit less pixels per screen inch.
The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone 12 mini, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 128 GB. The iPhone 12 mini counts with a much better performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same number of cores, the iPhone 12 mini also has more RAM and a 64-bits processor.
The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with improved battery life than Apple iPhone 12 mini, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2227mAh. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has just a bit better camera than iPhone 12 mini, because although it has slower video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking images and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a much higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.