Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro has a general score of 92.8, which is a lot better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 74.1 global score. IPhone 12 Pro's design is extremely newer and incredibly thinner than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s, but it is also a little bit heavier. The iPhone 12 Pro has a much greater processing power than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same number of cores, the iPhone 12 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM and a 64-bits processor.
IPhone 12 Pro has a better looking screen than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen and a little lower 1170 x 2532 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display. Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a slightly better camera than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with just a bit longer battery life than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.