Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro Max is way better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having a 93.2 score against 74.1. The iPhone 12 Pro Max construction is newer and notably thinner than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s, although it is also way heavier. IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with an extremely better processor than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have a Hexa-Core CPU, the iPhone 12 Pro Max also has a higher amount of RAM memory and a 64-bits CPU.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a brighter screen than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a bit worse 1284 x 2778 pixels resolution and a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger screen. IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) takes clearer photographs and videos than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light images and video and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution.
IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 3687mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.