Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 9.x |
| 2015-09-03 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 625.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A9 APL1022 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2750mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 384 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 6s Plus is much better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting an 84.2 score against 74.1. The Apple iPhone 6s Plus design is a little bit heavier but notably thinner than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and both were only released with a couple of months difference. IPhone 6s Plus features a more powerful processing unit than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has less processing cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processor.
The Apple iPhone 6s Plus has a sharper display than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), although it has a little bit inferior pixels count per inch of screen, a lot lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a little smaller screen. Apple iPhone 6s Plus counts with a slightly better memory to store more apps and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) captures a little bit better pictures and videos than iPhone 6s Plus, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a way more mega pixels camera in the back, a bigger diafragm aperture and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and pictures.
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features just a bit longer battery life than iPhone 6s Plus, because it has a 9 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.