Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2015-09-03 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is much better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having a general score of 82 against 74.1. Although the iPhone XR is a little bit heavier than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), it's thinner and notably newer. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a slightly better looking screen than iPhone XR, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way better screen density.
The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB.
Apple iPhone XR counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone XR also has a 64-bit CPU. Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) and Apple iPhone XR feature quite similar battery durations, although the Apple iPhone XR has a 2 percent smaller battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a slightly better camera than iPhone XR, because although it has a smaller aperture and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.