Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2015-09-03 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a global score of 80.2, which is a bit better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s overall score of 74.1. The Google Pixel body is newer, a lot lighter and way thinner than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Google Pixel has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has less cpu cores , it also counts with more RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a little sharper display than Google Pixel, because it has a quite bigger display, a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a F2 camera aperture, the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera.
The Google Pixel counts with a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.