Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2015-09-03 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is much better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s score of 74.1. The Google Pixel 4 construction is noticeably newer, just a bit lighter and a lot thinner than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Google Pixel 4 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a slightly better display than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a bit better screen pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB.
The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh. Moto X Pure Edition (2015) captures just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a lot better 21 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.