Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is a lot better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting a score of 89 against 74.1. Google Pixel 5's construction is extremely newer, somewhat lighter and way thinner than Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Google Pixel 5 features a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores.
The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit better screen density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a lot better resolution camera and a bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.