Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2022-07-21 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Plastic | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 6a is a bit better than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting a global score of 76.4 against 74.1. Google Pixel 6a's design is extremely newer, extremely thinner and a little bit lighter than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a brighter display than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a bit better display density.
The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a much greater hardware performance than Google Pixel 6a, although it has 3 GB less RAM, they both have 6 CPU cores. The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) shoots clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing images or video in low-light environments and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a camera with a way better 21 mega pixels resolution.
The Google Pixel 6a has slightly more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 6a features a superior battery performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 47% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.