Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Honor 50 Pro has an overall score of 77, which is a little bit better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 74.1 global score. Although the Honor 50 Pro is a little bit heavier than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), it's much thinner and also extremely newer. The Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a greater number of faster cores and 5 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a bit sharper screen than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a just a bit better pixel density. Honor 50 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Honor 50 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Honor 50 Pro also has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography in low-light situations.
Honor 50 Pro counts with improved battery performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 33% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.