Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| 2015-09-03 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U11 is a bit better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting a overall score of 77.6 against 74.1. HTC U11's body is newer, just a bit lighter and way thinner than Moto X Pure Edition (2015). HTC U11 counts with a little better performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 1 GB more RAM memory and 2 more cpu cores.
HTC U11 has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1440 x 2560px resolution, the HTC U11 also counts with a little better pixel density. HTC U11 and Moto X Pure Edition (2015) count with extremely similar storage to install games and applications, they have an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB and equal 64 GB internal storage.
The HTC U11's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery duration in Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features just a bit better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better 21 mega-pixels resolution and a larger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.