Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-09-03 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 Fit has a global score of 77, which is a little bit better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s global score of 74.1. The LG G7 Fit construction is noticeably newer, somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015). LG G7 Fit counts with a bit superior processing unit than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with more RAM memory.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a little higher display pixel density and a quite larger display. The LG G7 Fit features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG G7 Fit's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery life in Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a slightly better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a larger aperture, a back facing camera with a much better 21 mega-pixels resolution and a much larger sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.