Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-09-03 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ has a global score of 81, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 74.1 score. LG G7 ThinQ's construction is newer, a bit lighter and noticeably thinner than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015). LG G7 ThinQ has a much better display than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a bit larger screen, a little higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a quite higher display pixel density.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG G7 ThinQ features a camera that is just as good as the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) one, because although the LG G7 ThinQ has a lot smaller back camera sensor taking way lower quality images, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot less megapixels back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light photos.
LG G7 ThinQ has a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG G7 ThinQ and Moto X Pure Edition (2015) have extremely similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.