Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K52 has a global score of 76, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 74.1 score. LG K52 is a extremely newer and thinner cellphone than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), but it is a bit heavier. LG K52 counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a more vivid display than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher pixel density and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. LG K52 has a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG K52 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) shoots a bit better pictures and videos than LG K52, because although it has a much less mega pixels back facing camera, a tinier back-facing camera sensor and a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition. The LG K52 features better battery duration than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.