Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Titan gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a general score of 85.4, which is better than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s global score of 74.1. LG K92's body is a lot newer and a lot thinner than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s, but it's also heavier. The LG K92 has a little faster CPU than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a bit sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel count in each display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. LG K92 counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG K92 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG K92 also has a larger aperture to take better low light images, a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality photos and videos and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
The LG K92 counts with greater battery duration than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.