Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2015-09-03 | 2017-07-21 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.87 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.15 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Gray |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Q8 has a score of 77.2, which is slightly better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 74.1 score. The LG Q8 is a newer phone, and it is also somewhat lighter and much thinner than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015). LG Q8 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM.
The LG Q8 counts with a slightly better display than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1440 x 2560 resolution, the LG Q8 also counts with a little better pixels density. LG Q8 counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has just a bit better camera than LG Q8, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting photos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back and a larger back-facing camera sensor.
LG Q8's battery duration is very similar to the battery performance in Moto X Pure Edition (2015).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.