Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Holographic white |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Stylo 6 has a general score of 76.7, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s general score of 74.1. The LG Stylo 6 body is noticeably newer and thinner, but somewhat heavier than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a slightly better display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher display density.
The LG Stylo 6 has a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the LG Stylo 6 also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 6 counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) captures much clearer videos and photos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photographs or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos and a way higher 21 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The LG Stylo 6 features longer battery performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.