Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-09-03 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is much better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting an 82.5 score against 74.1. LG V30S ThinQ is a a lot newer cellphone, and it is also incredibly thinner and somewhat lighter than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a bit larger screen, a just a bit better pixel quantity in each display inch and a little higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 3 GB more RAM memory and more cores. The LG V30S ThinQ features a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) shoots slightly better videos and photos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.