Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s general score of 74.1. Even though the LG Velvet is just a little heavier than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), it's notably thinner and newer. The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a bit sharper screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher pixel density.
LG Velvet features a bit more powerful processor than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 2 more cores and a higher amount of RAM. LG Velvet counts with a better camera than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG Velvet also has a larger camera aperture for better low light photos and video, a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
LG Velvet counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage. LG Velvet counts with a much longer battery duration than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.