Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has an overall score of 92.8, which is way better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 74.1 general score. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro design is much newer and way thinner than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s, although it's just a little heavier. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a more powerful CPU than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has just a bit better display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch in the screen. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a much better camera than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a back camera with a much higher resolution, a way better video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a very superior battery duration than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.