Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is much better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s general score of 74.1. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro construction is noticeably newer and notably thinner, but heavier than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory and 2 lesser CPU cores (although faster).
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit better screen than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a quite worse pixel amount per screen inch and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a bigger screen. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a lot better camera than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a larger aperture for better low-light images and video, a way better video definition, a lot higher resolution back camera and a way bigger sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a superior storage to store more games and applications than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 53% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.