Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is much better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), with a global score of 81.9 against 74.1. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo construction is extremely newer, thinner and just a little lighter than Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM and less CPU cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a lot better screen than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a little inferior pixel amount per inch in the screen and a little worse resolution of 1256 x 2760px, it also counts with a quite larger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better camera than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a way more megapixels camera, a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light situations.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much longer battery life than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 4310mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.