Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Power is slightly better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), with a overall score of 76.1 against 74.1. Moto G Power is a way newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), but it is somewhat heavier. Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a bit sharper display than Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Moto G Power features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and 1 GB more RAM memory. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has just a bit better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and a bigger sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
Motorola Moto G Power has more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Power features a much longer battery performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.