Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2015-09-03 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus (2021) is a bit better than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having a general score of 79.3 against 74.1. The Moto G Stylus (2021) is a way newer and way thinner device than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), but it is also somewhat heavier. The Moto G Stylus (2021) has just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Moto G Stylus (2021) features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Moto G Stylus (2021) features greater battery performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 33% more battery size. The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited situations and a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.