Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-09-03 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z Force is a bit better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), with a general score of 75.8 against 74.1. The Motorola Moto Z Force construction is newer, noticeably thinner and just a bit lighter than Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Moto Z Force features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1440 x 2560px resolution, the Moto Z Force also counts with a just a little higher pixels count per screen inch.
Moto Z Force has just a little better performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with 1 GB more RAM. Moto X Pure Edition (2015) shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a smaller aperture, they both have a same resolution back camera, the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates.
The Motorola Moto Z Force features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Force counts with just a bit longer battery life than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.